Separation Agreement Neutral Reference Clause

Lance Manion, the lawyer at the house, was in the office as usual. After several sips of coffee, an iced doughnut and a ski over the morning e-mails, Manion turned to his mail pile. There was a letter from a work counsellor asking for information about a former co-worker, Sue Furst. Two years earlier, Furst had settled a complaint against the company (his second lawsuit). In the transaction agreement, the company agreed to respond to reference requests in accordance with its policy – that is: The indication of employment data, last position and final salary. The company also agreed that no one would indicate that Furst was fired or fired. In his third complaint against the company, Furst asserted that Manion`s statements to the counsel about the history of his trial are contrary to the transaction agreement. The company defended the complaint on the grounds that it was not a “reference” because the investigation did not come from a potential employer. Moreover, Manion`s comments did not violate the transaction treaty, as this agreement only specifies in a concrete way what is to be offered (name, rank and salary) and what cannot be done (notice of dismissal or dismissal), on the other hand. Manion was free to enter additional information as long as it did not indicate dismissal or dismissal. The court accepted and dismissed Furst`s complaint. There is no need for your former employer to provide you with a positive or even “neutral” reference, and in many post-separation scenarios, an employee may wonder how the employer will respond to a reference request.

For this reason, and because it will be very difficult to convince an employer to provide a favourable or neutral reference months or years after the separation, the best time to organize it during severance negotiations is the best time. Sometimes the employer covers related applications and prohibitions in a clause called “restitution of property” or “property and documents.” The employer will ask you to return all documents or other objects in your possession containing confidential or protected information, so that you are unable to communicate or share this information with third parties. By adding a no-disappearance regime, your former employer may prevent you from submitting to a wide range of measures, including, but not limited to false, defamatory, derogatory or negative comments that diminish the goodwill or reputation of the organization or interfere in the affairs of the organization. Remember that the redundancy agreement means the end of your employment relationship. As such, you may then be tempted to discuss any critical opinions you have ever held about the organization, from the quality of its services to how it handles complaints at work. If you have a non-disappearing provision in your contract, you will keep these ideas to yourself. Note that non-disappearing provisions often contain an exception when an employee is invited to testify under oath or respond to government requests.

Comments are closed.